A Hollywood Odyssey: Sparks take Ingmar Bergman on a journey to hell and back
The
Seduction of Ingmar Bergman is a fantasy about an attempt to lure
the internationally acclaimed Swedish director into making blockbuster movies
for a mythological Hollywood studio in the 1950s, and has been hailed
repeatedly as an original and compelling work of musical genius, an 'engrossing
and enriching piece', a 'what-if fictional fantasy', and 'a fascinating and
powerful discourse on the struggle between art and commerce'.3 Originally commissioned by Swedish radio and
broadcast from the Södra Teatern in Stockholm on 14 August 2009, with a British
airing in English on BBC Radio 6 Music on 28 October, the work, lasting
approximately sixty minutes with twenty-four sub-sections, was also released as
an album in 2009, and transformed into a theatrical experience, or a staged
readthrough of a planned film, in the John Anson Ford Amphitheatre at the Los
Angeles Film Festival on 25 June 2011.4 There are still ongoing plans to make it into
a feature film. The Swedish broadcast featured actors Jonas Malmsjö and Elin
Klinga, both of whom had worked in Ingmar Bergman's productions, while amongst
the actors involved in the Los Angeles production (ironically in the heart of
Tinseltown), was Finnish actor Peter Franzén. The translation from sound only piece to
a potential film script was effected visually by the Canadian film
director Guy Maddin reading aloud stage directions to introduce and link each
sub-section and filming some of the action from the side of the stage . The performance was warmly received by
audience and critics, and described as 'sexy, savvy, absurdly catchy, funny as
hell and dazzling in its audacity'.5 The Seduction of Ingmar Bergman is,
like Sparks themselves, all of these things, and more, and this paper proposes
that much of the power of the work also
stems from its affinities with the age-old story of the 'Hero's Journey' which
enhance its themes of integrity and vision versus corruption, greed and
corporate cynicism and the clash of artistic and cultural sensibilities in
Europe and America .
There
is already a clear link between the metanarrative of the Hero's Journey and the
ethos of movie making: in his 1998 book The Writer's Journey: Mythic
Structures for Writers , Christopher Vogler, himself an industry
professional, offers an exhaustive discussion and plentiful examples of the
different aspects of the Hero's Journey and how they may be (and have been)
applied in Hollywood screenplays. He cites
films as diverse as The Lion King, Titanic, Pulp Fiction, The
Full Monty, The Wizard of Oz, Beverly Hills Cop, and the Star Wars
movies as examples which draw on the story in different and innovative ways.
This book, based on Vogler's earlier Practical Guide, carries
testimonials from scriptwriters, directors and producers praising it as one of
the standard Hollywood guidebooks for the screenwriting craft, which
demonstrates the wide-ranging and continuing relevance of Campbell's argument.6 The ingenuity of The Seduction of
Ingmar Bergman is that the narrative structure so often reworked in
Hollywood movies operates here, together with the manipulation of many of the
conventions and clichés of both musicals and adventure films, to satirise the
commercialism and corrupt methods of an imaginary studio, and the dangerous
consequences of the obsession with celebrity and box-office receipts. Although
the tale is set in the 1950s, and the studio is a composite of the powerful
studios of the period, these themes clearly remain relevant to debates about
art and commercialism in many cultural fields in more recent times (most
notably, currently, in the case of television). The Maels themselves are not
strangers to the vicissitudes and disappointments of trying to bring a screenplay to fruition in a
highly competitive, cut-throat, profit-obsessed world.7 The Seduction of Ingmar Bergman is
indeed, as many reviewers of the album and show in the U.K.and U.S. press
remarked, a dark fairy tale or fable for our times that, like many traditional
fairy tales, manages to be funny, tragic, frightening and thought provoking at
the same time.8 The comparison with fairy tales and fables
is not inappropriate or inconsistent: Bergman himself declared in an interview
in 1971 his interest in fairy tales, especially cruel ones, and according to
Ron Mael, although they did not have a specific tale in mind, the notion of
Ingmar Bergman appearing in a musical creates in itself a surreal and dreamlike
quality.9 The Maels have also spoken of their 'liking
for inconsistency': in this case both musically and dramatically, as the music
encompasses different styles (echoes of Kurt Weill, synth pop, classical,
polka, vaudeville, jazz) and instruments (piano, orchestra, guitar, drums), and
the plot and characterization feature anacronistic images and juxtapose stereotypical American clichés with
Bergman's severe, existential stance, always 'thinking of big things'.10 This
paper does not pretend to do justice to the varied and evocative music of the piece,
which both accompanies and reflects the sung and spoken words and comments upon
the action, but focuses on the effect of the elements of the 'Hero's Journey'
narrative which can be identified in this compelling fantasy.
The
basic structure of this narrative, as defined by Campbell, involves the hero
leaving home, either on a quest or unintentionally, and entering a strange and
often dangerous world: 'a place of strangely fluid and polymorphous beings,
unimaginable torments, superhuman deeds and impossible delight' , a definition
that could equally well apply to the world of movies.11 Here he (or she) encounters dangers,
temptations and threats from monstrous opponents which he is finally able to
overcome, often with help from a beneficent being, and from which he returns
home, having achieved his goal, to welcome and reward. Asserting that myths
give symbolic expression to the unconscious desires, fears and tensions that
underlie human behaviour and communicate traditional wisdom, Campbell embraced
the ideas of Carl. G. Jung to argue that, as well as a literal adventure, the
journey may be seen as an inward one, the dangers encountered by the modern
hero symbolising aspects of the unconscious, his struggle with personal inner
demons on a journey of self-discovery leading to wholeness and the confirmation
of individual identity.12
Just as retellings of this fundamental narrative often draw on
contemporary concerns, so the reactions and interpretations by any readership
or audience are likely to be influenced by their own experiences and cultural
context as well as by any prior knowledge of similar stories. Intertextual
references and echoes of other narratives are commonly used to create the
pleasure of recognition and to reinforce a point, as evidenced by the frequent
use of images from fairy tales in advertising.13 In The Seduction
of Ingmar Bergman, there are multiple levels of interdisciplinarity which embellish the basic
structure of the hero story with allusions to Bergman's films, references to
typical Hollywood film soundtrack music and echoes of songs and musical styles
from the long and distinguished career of Sparks. At the broadest level, the
theme of the journey, both literal and metaphorical, plays a structural and
thematic role in many of Bergman's films (notably Wild Strawberries,
1957), as it does in the 24 episodes here.14 The major themes of Bergman's films are, in
effect, not unlike those found in myths and fairy tales: the binary oppositions
of good and evil, the existence of God and the devil, dream and reality, art
and life, the mask and the face, life and death, the conscious and the
unconscious, the struggle to find meaning in life, and all of these can be seen
to feature here.15 Moreover,
the real Bergman had strong views on the struggle between art and commerce: in
an interview in June1968, he asserted that after his making of This Can't
Happen Here (1950), he said to himself that never again would he make a
film for money or allow anyone to buy him, because 'if I start playing fast and
loose with ethics, I'll lose my inherent value as a human being, everything
that gives me the feeling that I have a right to make films'.16 Similarly, in an interview given on the day of
the Los Angeles staged performance, Ron and Russell Mael acknowledged that,
although the theme of art versus commerce was not initially a conscious
personal statement, it could indeed be seen to relate to their own career,
describing temptations to depart from their own artistic vision as a 'battle of
selling their souls to the devil'.17 Alert Sparks fans will also pick up on themes
running through many of their earlier songs, which are themselves often like
mini-operas (the uncertainties of life and love, cynicism and dishonesty in
relationships, self-doubt, fear of humiliation and betrayal, the precariousness
of identity) and familiar characteristics of the lyrics (such as concise and
understated wit, layered meanings, repetition, allusive innuendo). They will
also recognise the significance of the
dichotomy between European and American artistic sensibilities, an issue that
has played an important role in Sparks' career path. Not least, they will be delighted and hooked
from the start by the subtle reference to Sparks' iconic song 'This town aint
big enough for the both of us', from the 1974 album Kimono My House, in
the third episode as the Bergman character arrives in Hollywood.
The
origin of The Seduction of Ingmar Bergman as a radio musical has
important implications, not least because Bergman himself wrote for the medium
which, he felt, had special possibilities, being at once 'more intimate and
poetical than visual theatre'.18
Arguably radio drama is all the more evocative because the listener's
imagination is more acutely stimulated and is forced to become active, to
collaborate in the enterprise without the distraction of visual elements. The Seduction of Ingmar Bergman, as
both radio play and album, blends the spoken word, song, music and sound
effects to tell a story in a highly innovative and ingenious manner. Whereas in Stockholm, the work was played in
a theatre in front of a screen that showed only a picture of Bergman, the
transition to a staged version employed large surreal projected images behind
the stylised movements of the live actors which challenged a realistic
interpretation and enhanced the illusion
of fantasy.19 These included
huge sketched faces of Bergman and other figures, snatches of the lyrics and
collages blending vintage imagery from Sweden, Los Angeles and Bergman's films:
thus, the famous Dance of Death image of silhouetted figures against a dark
cloud in The Seventh Seal is reproduced against a Californian sunset
with tall palm trees, and in another the giant head and shoulders of Greta
Garbo are seen looming over the Beverly Hills Hotel and figures on a
beach. It is, of course, essential in
any medium to catch the audience's attention and interest from the start with
the title of a piece, and the opening scene. This title evokes the erotic
promise of many of Bergman's titles (Illicit Interlude (1951); A
Lesson in Love (1954) for example) as well as intriguing the audience
members who may expect a sensational drama-documentary of Bergman's personal
life. The opening scene-setting sequence or prologue is the excited
announcement, in three languages with drumbeats and enthusiastic applause, of
the jury's prize for 'poetic humour' awarded to Bergman's Smiles of a Summer
Night (1955) at the 1956 Cannes Film Festival, an honour which
allegedly took the director by surprise.20 This immerses the listening audience directly
within the Cannes event, both contextualising the story and pointing towards
the central theme of international recognition and acclaim which is the
foundation of the temptation the fictional Bergman is to undergo: whether to be
seduced by Hollywood into allowing his often proclaimed artistic integrity to
be perverted by celebrity status and the commercialism of the American film industry,
or to resist, because, as Bergman himself put it in 1968, 'What you say 'yes'
to, and what you say 'no' to in your work. Nothing else matters'.21
The
fictional Bergman, like his real counterpart, encapsulates the qualities of the
composite hero figure in a number of ways: he has exceptional gifts within his
sphere (in his case, his achievements and a strong sense of his artistic
vision), and is honoured by his own society.22 He also displays universal emotions such as
moments of self-doubt and fear. In episode 2, against a background of sweeping
orchestral music reminiscent of many a movie opening, he introduces himself,
directly addressing his audience who, he recognises, may or may not have heard
of him or his films and, like Dante in the Divina Commedia, proceeds to
tell the tale of what happened to him at a critical moment in his life. The
detail about Bergman and his career in this introduction is minimal but enough
for the audience to appreciate the import of what follows. He recounts that the
success at Cannes of Smiles of a Summer Night, a comedy unlike his usual
work, triggered a strange and unexpected reaction in him, the urge to enter a cinema to watch an
American action movie of the sort he detests ('Have you ever felt compelled to
do something against your will? I have. I have.') He ponders why he should have
endured 'escapist art of the worst kind' for ninety minutes, wondering whether
it was an urge to do something mindless or simply 'the urge to do
something...unlike Ingmar Bergman?' (episode 2). Whether this is a moment of self-doubt, the
subconscious pull of the opposite or, since he is already on the verge of
difference with Smiles of a Summer Night, a nascent temptation to take
his work in a new direction is left unanswered. This moment is what Campbell
calls 'the Call to Adventure', when 'destiny has summoned the hero and
transferred his spiritual centre of gravity from within the pale of his society
to a zone unknown'.23 This
lure is not always understood by the hero himself and, in Bergman's case, its
embodiment in a film foreshadows the unknown world he is about to enter. Bergman's uncertainty, which suggests a
vacillating sense of identity and hence vulnerability to temptation, would
support the interpretation that what follows is a dream, one that exemplifies
an inner struggle between his integrity and the prospect of critical, popular
and commercial success suggested by the Cannes accolade. The movie theatre,
appropriately, represents the portal to the unknown world in which this hero's
adventure is to take place. This is a
notion that the real Bergman would have appreciated: he has described the
starting point for his film Wild Strawberries (1957) as a fantasy about
opening a door and going back into one's childhood, then opening another door
and returning to reality or a different period of one's life.24 Here, going through the exit, Bergman finds
himself in an unfamiliar street in a world that is both real and, yet, as the
general perception of Hollywood as Tinseltown suggests, not dissimilar to the
worlds of fantasy or fairy tale. Just as the unknown world contrasts with the
hero's ordinary world, so here the contrasts between Bergman's Sweden and the
United States are manifested at many different levels, from the weather and
food to language and cultural tastes. It is strange, yet strangely familiar, a
parallel world where Bergman finds himself the protagonist in a new narrative
in which he is clearly expected but where he is no longer in control even of
his own movements.
In the 'unknown world' of myth and
fairy tale, the hero typically encounters both dangers and dangerous delights,
challenges and a range of obstacles and antagonists. These may include
guardians of the threshold at the entrance to this 'zone of magnified power'.
who block his way or test his powers, ogres, sirens, shapeshifters and,
usually, an arch villain or enemy.25 The limo driver who meets
Bergman as he emerges from the portal is the first of the threshold guardians,
a sort of Charon of the freeways who ferries the visitor to his destination
against a background of street noises, squealing tyres and a discordant and
insistent beat. The sycophantic
trivialities of his conversation in response to Bergman's increasingly anxious
protests demonstrate a nightmarish lack
of communication and a latent menace. Unlike the guide figure of myth, or
Dante's Virgil, who may impart helpful information, the limo driver's refusal to depart from his tourist- welcoming
platitudes exacerbates the reluctant Bergman's agitation and futile attempts at
self-assertion, signalled by rapid piano notes racing ever more frantically up
and down the scale. In accordance with
the next stage of the Hero's Journey, Bergman is conducted to another portal
(the studio gates) which will lead him into the part of this strange world that
will hold the most dangers and temptations and where the battle for his soul
will begin. The motto that Dante finds over the entrance to hell, 'Abandon hope
all ye who enter here', irresistibly springs to mind. Here the dramatic question that, as Vogler
describes, must motivate the piece and hook the audience is posed: will Bergman submit to the
seduction of Hollywood or overcome the challenges to his independence and stay
true to his artistic vision?26
His meetings with further threshold guardians, the automata-like doorman
and concierge who retain his hotel keys, and the telephone operator who, in a
Kafka-esque scene, claims that there is no such place as Sweden on her list,
reveal the typical isolation and vulnerability of the hero far from home, for
although Hollywood promises Bergman freedom, he is in fact imprisoned and
controlled at every turn, the victim of an apparent conspiracy. The values of this world, based it would seem
on the criteria of money, sex and getting a tan, are revealed in the
wonderfully funny episode of the 'Hollywood Welcoming Committee' (episode 8), a
beautiful hooker sent by the studio to relax and persuade the still reluctant
Bergman. Like Circe in the Odyssey, she represents the dangerous delight
of sexuality that will threaten the hero's self-control and power, offering,
instead of Circe's magic potion, a cup of herbal tea. She acknowledges that she represents a blatant
attempt to persuade him to stay because of his well-known 'weakness for the
girls', and her blandishments mingle a picture of a life of artistic freedom in
Hollywood that corresponds to his professional desires and frustrations
('budgets for what you want to do/ Crews that can read your mind and work all
night/ Work all night') with the allusive promise of sexual gratification
('Tell me how best to make my case, any ol' way or face to face').
The
hero's main adversary at the film studio is the Studio Chief, spoken and sung
by Russell Mael channelling a smoothly sinister screen villain, a tempter whose
cynical and shallow manipulativness is revealed in his hushed advice to his
people on how to handle Bergman on his arrival. The rhythmically chanted
repetition of a refrain ('Here he is now'), a frequent stylistic device in
Sparks' songs, creates a menacing atmosphere reminiscent of 'The Rhythm Thief' from the 2002 album Lil'
Beethoven. His jokey politeness to
Bergman in episode 5 is false and sycophantic, like the mask worn by the evil
archetypes of myth. After patronising
him with Swedish mineral water and a totally unnecessary translator, he reveals
the pure self-interest of Hollywood's motives in wishing to acquire Bergman's
talent and reputation ('we need you to help erase/ Image problems,
self-imposed/ Art and commerce, never close/ You can bring us both of those')
and at the same time, his dismissive disdain for 'art' in the concession that
'Works of art can also work/For some Midwest creepy jerk'. There is a real life
context for this scenario: in the 1950s, the old Hollywood studios were in
decline because of the decrease in movie audiences and were seeking to expand
their international activities, and the old movie moguls were eventually being
replaced by a new generation of studio heads tasked with reversing the drop in
profits .27 The first stage of the attempted seduction begins with
the Studio Chief's crass and fatuous praise of Bergman's films which, with its
repetition of the word 'great' paradoxically deconstructs the notion of
inherent value (as in the Sparks song 'Popularity' from the album Sparks
In Outer Space (1983)) in terms of both language and artistic
sensibility. His promise of rewards of
financial and artistic freedom, a deal that emphasises the benefits of mutual
help to Bergman himself come across like the proposal of a gangster or
protection racketeer. However, just as
the hero of myth is exposed to temptations that correspond to his deepest fears and thus are all the more seductive, this
enticement insidiously alludes to the economic difficulties Bergman experienced
with the Swedish film industry, which ceased production altogether for an
unspecified period in 1951.28
The Studio Chief can thus be seen as what Vogler calls the 'Shadow', a
dangerous enemy because he is to an extent a magnified and distorted reflection
of the Hero's desires and fears.29
The posing in this episode of the central themes of The Seduction of
Ingmar Bergman, art versus commerce and the clash of artistic visions, is
the more forceful and insistent for each line being dutifully repeated in
Swedish by the interpreter. The Studio
Chief's assertion in episode 6 that Bergman will come around as others have
done indicates both a smug assumption of the superiority of the Hollywood way
and a cynical view of human nature.
Bergman now has to face the conflict engendered by the seemingly
rational arguments of his antagonist, the 'weasel logic of the powerful
vulgarian', which cause him, like many heroes of myth to hesitate.30
As the limo ferries him back to the Beverly Hills Hotel, he ponders that he
should not be too hasty in rejecting the proposition while at the same time
recognising the downside, notably communication problems and what he finds most
distasteful in much American output, its 'abominable' music, 'ridiculous'
method acting and destructive cult of celebrity. The contrast in imperatives is
underlined by the insistent beat accompanying the driver's words and the
orchestral sweep of the music signalling Bergman's (spoken) interior monologue.
The
central test for Bergman comes in episode 10, 'The Studio Commissary', an apt
equivalent to what Vogler calls the 'Inmost Cave' where the hero faces death.31 Here Bergman becomes like the ancient
travellers Odysseus and Aeneas, or Dante, in their descent to the Underworld,
confronted not with shades of his past, a vision of the future or the fate of
sinners, but with a pantheon of other famous emigré directors who, for
different reasons, personal and political, have come to work in Hollywood, and
are now happily gorging themselves with steak and cake in this land of plenty.
Against a background of chatter and clattering cutlery, the shapeshifting
Studio Chief attempts to lure him into a Faustian bargain with ambiguous
half-truths and flattery, identifying directors with whom Bergman might
empathise and who allegedly overcame anxieties about the cultural divide
between Europe and America: 'Their vision made it here unscathed, none felt a
whore/ none felt he caved'. He even
answers his reservation about language difficulties by confidently asserting
that English is the common tongue of cinema, an observation on the universal
pervasiveness of American culture and an implied denigration of other foreign
language films that amount to a provocative display of cultural imperialism.
The directors enjoying symbolic physical gratification like robots in the
Commissary were indeed all famous names in the 1950s or earlier (Alfred
Hitchcock, Billy Wilder, Fritz Lang and Jose Von Sternberg among them) and
worked for a variety of studios of which this is an imaginary composite. The
films named in the Studio Chief's recitation of their achievements (Sunset
Boulevard, The Man Who Knew Too Much, Cat People, Sunrise, Detour) were all
Oscar winners or commercial successes, but the Studio Chief's over-familiar and
insincerely trite praise conceals a subtext of compromise: 'one could quibble
which was best, their Old World work or/ work out west'.32 This information is rattled off in the manner
of a list song (which recalls the recitation of
scent brands in 'Perfume' on the Hello Young Lovers album (2006),
for example), accompanied by a chorus of almost demonic laughter to a
comic beat. The Chief's mask of conciliatory mateyness elides at the end of the
episode into a thinly disguised threat as he urges Bergman to make the right
choice. Like the epic heroes tempted by sirens, Bergman wrestles with his
conscience, although acutely aware of
his own superiority and their crassness: 'My first instinct would be to
tell them to go to hell', words which the real Bergman actually used in an
interview in 1971 when asked about external interference in his work, as the
Maels were delighted to discover.33 But the fictional Bergman is also aware of the
attractive prospect of American money bankrolling his work, hovering on the
brink of capitulation as he wonders whether he could survive in Hollywood as he
repeats: 'So I must not be hasty' (episode 11).
In
the episodes that follow this existential crisis, three ordeals involving
monsters that in the tradition of the hero story, correspond to his fears
trigger the next stage in his story. In the first, a confrontation with a
Hollywood starlet (episode 13), presumably based on the temperamental 1930s
star Simone Simon identified in the Commissary,
during an imagined and disastrous film shoot, contrasts with the real
Bergman's close relationship with his own Swedish actors and exemplifies his
fictional alter ago's anxieties about a star not understanding his temperament
on set and his ability to communicate his aims in such an alien atmosphere. The
arrogant and aggressive starlet personifies the perversion of art and the
warping of human nature by the cult of celebrity in her brutal rejection of his
artistic approach and efforts to make her share his vision. In her assumption
of the superior power of the star over the director, manifested in the repeated
refrain of 'Who do you think you are? Why do you take that tone with me',
underlined by a crash of cymbals and drums at the end of each line, she is an
embodiment of the uncontrolled female power of mythical or fairy tale witches
or femmes fatales who threaten to eat or otherwise destroy the male
protagonist. In the Hollywood starlet, Sparks fans will also recognise the
predatory, capricious and emasculating female type who haunts their songs (in
Please, baby please' or 'Something for the girl with everything', for example
from In Outer Space (1983) and Propaganda (1974) respectively).
Subsequently, in an unnerving but comic scene, Bergman is pursued by a
Hollywood tour bus and finds that he has become another tourist attraction,
pointed out to visitors as a curiosity and urged to perform the role of famous
foreign director for the public. His existence and his work are trivialised in
the ebullient tour guide's spiel intoned against staccato notes, excited
shrieks and applause: 'We can only hope that the sun doesn't burn the
trademark/Scandinavian gloom out of his outlook./ That's why we love him!', an
insincere accolade that is a concisely humorous articulation of Bergman's
dilemma. The perniciousness of celebrity (lamented in Sparks' song 'Funny Face'
from the Whomp that Sucker album (1981)), is underlined as Bergman
almost becomes a victim of fan violence, pursued and hounded by a pack of
autograph hunters, his increasing panic evident in the drum beats accompanying
his repeated need to get away from their demands and screams. (In the Los
Angeles staged version, Bergman was the centre of a tug-of-war which stretched
his (fake) arms to bizarre lengths.)The hotel concierge's laconically
terrifying remark that he seems to be the object of some Hollywood hospitality
is the catalyst for the next stage in his story, corresponding to the hero's
'Escape and Return Home', in which, typically, according to Vogler, the story's
energy is revved up to a climax.34.
In
Episode 17 'Bergman ponders escape', which is introduced by eerie, dreamy
music,
Bergman finds himself face to face
with the preoccupations of many of his own films: solitude, fear, hopelessness and loss of identity, but
of a nightmarish sort that directly affects himself. The essential wrongness of
his situation dawns on him: 'This Hollywood is not a place. It's a sensibility
at/ complete odds with my sensibility' together with the problem of escape from
somewhere that is more an idea than a physical location. This further supports
the allegorical interpretation of his adventure as a dream or an imagining of a
possible future self from which his instinct is to flee. His flight is preceded
by a scene in which the Studio Chief's mask of facile bonhomie slips to reveal
his true nature, his disbelief at Bergman's rejection morphing into something
like a curse, grounded in the unshakeable assumption that Hollywood is the
centre of the film universe : 'He'll see that he is lost without us/ He'll
never be that great without us' (episode 18). Vogler writes that the 'Escape
episode of the archetypical hero story
has produced many of the most exciting chase scenes in movie history.35 The two episodes that follow (19 and 20) are
both an appropriation of and ironic homage to the conventions of the Hollywood
chase scene, a witty device to symbolise the ruthless abuse of power by the
studios as Bergman himself becomes an actor in a big budget Hollywood action
film, exactly like the one he was watching earlier, pursued by police cars and
helicopters who are prepared to shoot him down if necessary. Bergman's repeated
spoken refrain of 'They're after me, they're after me' , with slightly differing
emphases (reminiscent of the song 'My baby's taking me home' from the Lil'
Beethoven album (2002)), humorously preceded by a short burst of a heavenly
choir, is placed against the chanted and sung commands of the megaphone-bearing
police officer and a cacophony of jangly notes, running footsteps, car horns,
sirens and the whirring of helicopters to produce a frightening auditory
experience that still manages to retain a comic side. According to Campbell, the pursuit of the
hero in myth may indeed be comical and lively if it is resented by the enemy
gods or demons, as it manifestly is here.36 Ironically, the real
Bergman claimed that the only fun he had in making the film This Can't
Happen Here' (1950) was a delightful experience when he had forty police cars
under his control and enjoyed ordering retakes of a scene in which they had to
screech at speed up to a quayside.37 The chase scenes in The Seduction of Ingmar
Bergman also offered the opportunity to introduce some bombastic big
Hollywood-style music as a contrast to the more intimate music of earlier
scenes.38 They evoke the
soundtrack of a typical action movie as the pace of the chase intensifies, the
order is given to fire rockets and let dogs loose: 'he won't know what hit him,
I'm sure/ Before he reaches the shore/ A little afternoon gore'. Like many
mythical heroes before him, the increasingly fearful and desperate Bergman
recognises that in every sense, 'this place is death to me', a conclusion
confirmed by the declaration of the
Studio Chief, that if they can't take him alive, they may have no choice but to
kill him rather than let him return home.
It
is common for the hero to need help in his return home from a saviour figure, a
benign power who knows the 'power of the zone', and Bergman is no exception.39
As he reaches the shore at Santa Monica, he finds himself an actor in a film
more like one of his own as he undergoes a moment of exhausted existential
angst and calls on God to prove that He exists and save him from this man-made
Hell: 'Send an angel down to lead/ Lead me from this barren land/ How the hell
can I believe/ If you withhold your guiding hand' (episode 21). In an interview with the L A. Record
in 2011, the Maels insisted that Bergman's plea was intended to be sincere,
evoking many such crises in his films, and that the fact that it is the only
moment in the work where he sings, underlines its importance for him.40 Unlike the Knight in The Seventh Seal,
however, he encounters not Death and a chess board, but, in the spirit of the
mythical hero's providential meeting with a goddess or fairy godmother, a
statuesque woman approaching him on the
beach. This is no supernatural being,
but a different sort of legendary beauty, a screen goddess, Greta Garbo.
The choice of Garbo was driven, according to Ron Mael, by the need to find a
saviour, preferably a woman and Swedish, who would be known to an audience
beyond Sweden, and the scene between these two icons of cinema on the beach at
Santa Monica, was not intended to be funny, but to be emotionally touching.41
It is also, of course, an
anacronism, as Garbo retired from the screen in 1941, but this is consistent
with the deliberate inconsistencies of time in this work which, as Ron Mael
asserts in the same interview, reveals their liking for 'things that are out of
place', and indicates that this story is not just about the past. In his
autobiographical work, The Magic Lantern (1967), Ingmar Bergman
describes his meeting with Garbo in terms that throw an interesting light on
the creation of modern myths and fits well with her role here: 'It is hard to
say whether great myths are unremittingly magical because they are myths or
whether the magic is an illusion, created by us consumers; but at that moment,
there was no doubt..... her beauty was imperishable'.42 The fictional Bergman's uncertainty about the
reality of either Garbo or Hollywood reiterates the question of the nature of
reality and dream that often finds expression in his films. Garbo, who,
ironically, became a big star in Hollywood and, of course, never appeared in
any of Bergman's films, while not an angel from God, is an angel of redemption
nonetheless who will help him to get back 'to somewhere monochrome', where he
will be 'a certain kind of free' (episode 22). This allusion to both the medium
of many of Bergman films, contrasted with Hollywood technicolour, and the fact
that Garbo herself never appeared on screen in colour, further emphasises the
appropriateness of her role here. Her
song echoes that of the Studio Chief
earlier ('You know that you'd be lost without me') but holds promise rather
than a threat as she leads him to a nearby movie theatre to watch a film she
made in Sweden as a rising Swedish star. This film, The Story of Gösta
Berling (1924) itself a story of redemption, is, she points out, the agent
of a double transformation: of herself to Hollywood star, and now of Bergman's
release and return home. Russell Mael described Garbo as a 'kind of bookend
device' in that since Bergman got himself into trouble by going to see the
American movie, so a Swedish icon shows him the way back and confirms that he
made the right decision to get away from Hollywood.43 The story comes full circle as they enter the
theatre and he resumes his retrospective narrative, accompanied by the same
music as his exposition in episode 2, describing his new-found sense of calm
and expectation as they watch this 'glorious Swedish film'. This, ironically,
conforms to Vogler's assertion that Hollywood movie makers prefer the circular
form of ending common in myth which leads to closure, completion and a
catharsis for the hero, often signalled by a repeated image or situation, to
open or ambiguous endings.44 The fictional Bergman' s statement that
his story has 'almost a Hollywood ending' unequivocally links it to both movie conventions and the happy
endings of fairy tale and myth. When the lights go up, Garbo has disappeared
and Bergman leaves the theatre alone though a new portal that returns him to a
Swedish street.
The
last scene (episode 24) is not imbued with the stereotypical Scandinavian gloom
that the Hollywood characters associate with Bergman's films, but provides a
joyous finale.Once again, Bergman's arrival is expected, a crowd of happy
Swedish people giving the returning hero a rapturous reception to a rousing and
cheerful tune. While the hero of myth characteristically brings back a boon or
elixir, actual or metaphorical, that will serve humanity and restore life in
the ordinary world, so Bergman is welcomed as part of the Swedish psyche
necessary to their culture, without whom they are lost.45 The crowd sings that only in Sweden can his
identity be stable and authentic, a truth articulated in a comic fashion: the
declaration that he has come back with no sign of a tan confirms that he has
not been contaminated by the values of a Hollywood that could not even
pronounce his name correctly. This reaffirming of personal and cultural
identity, the hero's hard won sense of wholeness, is endorsed by the repetition
of each line of their song and in the Los Angeles performance was underlined by the waving on
stage of a large Swedish flag. Indeed, the Swedish people's praise of his work
suggests that they alone understand and need his artistic vision rather than
the shallow sensationalism of Hollywood blockbusters ('without the depth that
Bergman brought/ Our lives were just an afterthought'). The story finishes on a
philosophical reflection: a quotation attributed to Socrates in Plato's Apology
that sums up Bergman's contribution to world cinema and acts as a challenge
to the audience: 'The unexamined live they say/ is not worth living, well,
O.K./ Ah, but Bergman well, he examines all/ and most of all himself' which is
juxtaposed with an abrupt but decisive 'Good night, that's all', a tongue in
cheek echo of a familiar sign-off from Warner Brothers cartoons.
The
seduction has failed, and Bergman has not been sucked into a world where greed
and self-interest are endemic and artistic endeavour is only valued for the
profits it brings. Rather, the real Bergman recalled that the success at
Cannes enabled him to achieve his desire to get his best-known film The
Seventh Seal made in Sweden.46 The imagined conflict here is validated by the
fact that he spoke repeatedly of his resolution to remain true to himself and
his artistic vision, one of the main reasons, he claimed, that he did not want
to work outside Sweden.47
Such a determination can of course also be applied, as a number of
reviewers have noted, to Sparks themselves, who have always taken pride in
pursuing their own goals sometimes at the expense of instant celebrity and huge
financial reward in the music world. The BBC review of the album made the
comparison explicitly, describing the story as 'one of cultural European intelligence,
resisting the bland homogenising influence of corporate America to carve its
own idiosyncratic path – does that remind you of anyone?' 48 In the
2011 interview, Ron and Russell Mael concede that the imperative of always
upholding one's ideals does indeed have parallels with their own
aesthetic.Their decision to stage an English version of The Seduction of
Ingmar Bergman for an American audience of film fans and professionals in
Los Angeles itself was a courageous one that was vindicated by the rave reviews
it received. There is a certain piquancy
in the whole enterprise of a musical by Americans that privileges European
culture over that of America, but then the Maels have long been self-confessed
Euro- and Anglophiles. The theme of the cultural divide, described by a review
in The Independent as one of 'the great artistic issues of the last
century' was thus effectively encapsulated and enacted in the two productions
in Sweden and America.49 To
try to interpret the impact on the different audiences in Sweden, the rest of
Europe and the United States is like entering a hall of mirrors, but The
Seduction of Ingmar Bergman does offer a universal kind of catharsis, an emotional release through
relief and laughter as well as the enjoyment of the masterly wit and invention
of the lyrics and music. This is by no means a conventional musical, which Ron
and Russell Mael claim to dislike as much as they detest the label 'rock
musical', but an attempt at a new genre
involving many different influences, although still embued with a rock
sensibility.50 It is to be
hoped that Sparks' goal of transforming this ingenious and moving musical drama into a feature film will
eventually become a reality, as it illuminates both ongoing debates about the
commercialization of art and the enduring relevance of an ancient narrative to
issues pertinent to contemporary culture.
References
1.
Joseph Campbell (1949), (1968) The Hero with
a Thousand Faces (Princeton: Princeton University Press), p.35. See, for
example, discussion in Marjory Hourihan, Deconstructing the Hero: Literary
Theory and Children's Literature (London and New York: Routledge, 1997);
John Stephens, and Robyn McCallum, Retelling Stories, Framing Culture.
Traditional Story and Metanarratives in Children's Fiction (New York:
Garland, 1998).
2.
For example, Morissey, Björk, Queen, Nirvana,
Depeche Mode, The Ramones and Faith No More amongst many others.
3.
See Simon
Price, The Independent on Sunday, 15 November 2009, www.ww.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/album-sparks-the-seduction-of-ingmar-bergman-lil-beethoven-records-1820763.html;
Gregory Weinkauf, The Huffington Post, 1 July 2011, www.huffpost.cm/us/entry/885530;
Dave Simpson, The Guardian , 27 November, 2009;
www.theguardian.com/music/2009/nov/27/sparks-the-seduction-of-ingmar-bergman.
Accessed 12 August 2016.
4.
See the official site http://theseductionofingmarbergman.com
for lyrics, music, images and a short extract from the performance at the Los
Angeles Film Festival.
5.
www.huffpost.com/us/entry/885530.
6.
Christopher Vogler, The Writer's Journey.
Mythic Structure for Writers (Los Angeles: Michael Weise, 1998).
7.
Sparks' plans in the 1990s for a film version of
the manga comic Mai the Psychic Girl did not come to fruition at that
time and the experience may have informed their views on the film industry in
this work.
8.
See, for example, John Payne, L.A. Weekly, 17
June, 2011, www.laweekly.com/musiclive-review-sparks-the-seduction-of-ingmar-bergman-2399900
, accessed 12 August 2016.
9.
Interview with IngmarBerman and Dick Cavett (2
August,1971) may be viewed on www.youtube.com/watch?v=85NzBOjVe6c,
accessed 12 August 2016; Ronald Mael, personal communication, 11 May 2016.
10. Interview
with Ron and Russell Mael (25 June, 2011) can be viewed at www.youtube.com/watch?v=LC2ofcf8RRg.
Accessed 12 August 2016.
11. Campbell,
The Hero, p.58.
12. Campbell,
The Hero, p. 256.
13. See,
for example, discussion in Roland Barthes, Le Plaisir du texte (Paris:
Seuil, 1973); Gérard Genette, Palimpsestes: la littérature au second degré (Paris: Seuil, 1982).
14. Egil
Törnqvist, Between Stage and Screen: Ingmar Bergman Directs (Amsterdam:
Amsterdam University Press, 1995), p.15.
15. Törnqvist,
Between Stage and Screen, p.13.
16. Stig
Björkman, Torsten Manns and Jonas Sima, Bergman on Bergman (London: Secker
& Warburg, 1973), p.66.
17. Interview
with Ron and Russell Mael, 25 June 2011.
18. Törnqvist,
Between Stage and Screen, p.198.
19. Projected
images created by Galen Johnson and Evan Johnson. See http://theseductionof ingmarbergman.com/images.php.
20. Björkman,
Manns and Sima, Bergman on Bergman, p.103. Music and lyrics can be
found at http//theseductionofingmarbergman.com/music.php and
http//theseductionofingmarbergman.com/lyrics.php.
21. Björkman,
Manns and Sima, Bergman on Bergman, p.62.
22. Campbell,
The Hero, p.37.
23. Campbell,
The Hero, p.58.
24. Björkman,
Manns and Sima, Bergman on Bergman, p.133.
25. Campbell,
The Hero, p.77.
26. Vogler,
The Writer's Journey, p.87.
27. Joel
W. Finler, The Hollywood Story (London:Pyramid
Books, 1989), p.13; p.35.
28. Björkman,
Manns and Sima, Bergman on Bergman,
p.50; Törnqvist, Between Stage and Screen, p.51.
29. Vogler,
The Writer's Journey, p.169.
30. Andy
Gill, The Independent review, 30/10/09, www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/reviews/album-sparks-the-seduction-of-ingmar-bergman-ll-beethoven1811482.html,
accessed 12 August 2016.
31. Vogler,
The Writer's Journey, p.145.
32. Billy
Wilder, Sunset Boulevard (1950, Paramount); Alfred Hitchcock, The Man
Who Knew Too Much (1934, Gaumont British Picture Corporation; 1956,
Paramount, premiered at the 1956 Cannes Festival); Jacques Tourneur, Cat
People (1942, RKO), F.W. Murnau, Sunrise, 1927, Fox); Edgar Ullmer, Detour
(1945, PRC Pictures).
33. Bergman
1971 interview with Dick Cavett; 2011 interview with Ron and Russel Mael.
34. Vogler,
The Writer's Journey, p.193.
35. Vogler,
The Writer's Journey, pp. 23-4.
36. Campbell,
The Hero, p.197.
37. Björkman,
Manns and Sima, Bergman on Bergman, p.48.
38. Ron
Mael, private communication,11 May 2016.
39. Campbell,
The Hero, p.214.
40. See
Lainna Fader, L. A. Record, 24 June 2011:
larecord.com/interviews/2011/06/24/sparks-creating-its-own-universe-muscally, accessed
12 August 2016
41. Ron
Mael, private communication, 11 May 2016; L.A. Record 24 June
2011, see note 40.
42. Ingmar
Bergman, The Magic Lantern, New York and London, Penguin, 1998), p.240.
He goes on to say that he then noticed flaws in her beauty.
43. L.A
Record, 24 June 2011, see note 40.
44. Vogler,
The Writer's Journey, pp. 223-225.
45. Campbell,
The Hero, p.193.
46. Björkman,
Manns and Sima, Bergman on Bergman, p.103.
47. Philip
Mosley, Ingmar Bergman: The Cinema as Mistress (London and Boston:
Marion Boyars, 1981), p.19.
48. Louis
Pattison, BBC review 2009, see www.bbc.co.uk/musc/reviews/pgfd,
retrieved 12 August 2016.
49. Andy
Gill, The Independent, 30 October 2009, see www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/reviews/album-sparks-the-seduction-of-ingmar-bergman-lil-beethoven-1811482
, retrieved 12 August 2016.
50. 25
June 2011 interview with Ron and Russell Mael.
Word count 7755